Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 09:55
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Risk Of Dengue Fever Is Just Another Reason Cruises Suck - Jalopnik
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Russia can stop this any time.
Do empaths fall easier for abusive people?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Belmont Stakes 2025: Odds, horses, prediction, complete bettor’s guide - New York Post
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Why do some mothers hate their daughters especially when they're the eldest?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?
Antidepressant withdrawal may be more persistent than doctors realize - PsyPost
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.